I was watching Dick
Tracy the other night, and I came to a realization: Dick Tracy vs. Big Boy Caprice (Al Pacino’s
character) is not the primary story in the movie. In fact, Dick Tracy is not the movie’s true
protagonist; Breathless Mahoney (Madonna’s character) fills that role. The movie is about how she manages to take
advantage of the misogyny of both the cops and mobsters and succeeds at her
plans until men on both sides destroy her for expressing her sexuality instead
of being a sex object.
Let me break it down [WARNING: 22-year-old spoilers
ahead]. Breathless, herself, points out
that everyone, Big Boy, Tracy, Tess Trueheart (Glenne Headly), sees her as just
a cheap floozy. She in turn uses that
perception of her to her advantage, as it allows her to be everywhere without anyone taking issue with her presence. She is present at Lips Manlis’ murder at the
hands of Big Boy, because Big Boy wanted her for arm candy. Because Big Boy sees her as a status symbol
and not a person, let alone a threat, she’s present at all of his business
dealings, including the one in which it is revealed that District Attorney Fletcher
(Dick Van Dyke’s character) is on Big Boy’s payroll. She twists Tracy around her finger
repeatedly, highlighting that he’s only involved with her for his own ends, in
order to get him to follow her and see exactly what she wants him or those
around him to see (the mob boss meeting; Tess walking in on her kissing Tracy;
etc.). Yes, Big Boy slaps her around for
sticking her nose into his business (a further sign of his more obvious
misogyny), but only when she asks questions, which she rarely needs to do, as
she remains in the background and observes the machinations around her.
From this position, she is able to accomplish
everything that Tracy and Big Boy are not.
When none of Big Boy’s mob can eliminate Tracy after weeks of attempts,
she manages to do it in two days, using information gathered while being
present in the background (Tess’ rift with Tracy; Fletcher’s corruption). She then, in turn, incriminates Big Boy when
Tracy can’t get any charges to stick by framing him for kidnapping, because she
knew exactly where Big Boy’s attentions were and/or were not focused and took
advantage of that knowledge. The thing
is, she also did it all by highlighting the perception of her, through her
choice of persona. By removing her face,
she’s both pointing out that she is considered a non-entity, and erasing the
one aspect of herself which gets her noticed: her looks. In fact, during the climax, she even points
out to Tracy that he considers her a non-entity in the conflict when she tells
him exactly where Big Boy escaped with Tess, and he heads in the opposite
direction. It takes her outright asking
“What, you don’t trust me?” for Tracy to listen to her.
The only reason her plan fails is that she expresses
her sexuality, in her desire for Tracy.
Keep in mind, her sexuality is separate from her sex-kitten persona: one
is what she uses to survive; the other is her actual desire (although one could
question whether she desires Tracy because he is, in fact, desirable, or if he
merely presents an opportunity to escape the situation in which she
lives). When she finally has everyone at
her mercy, and attempts to express her desires fully, that is when males from
both sides (the Kid/Dick Tracy Jr. (Charlie Korsmo’s character) and Big Boy)
inadvertently co-operate to destroy her.
Big Boy’s destruction follows, as right up until the end he dismisses
Breathless (in her Blank disguise), which allows Tracy to get the drop on him.
In the end, while the movie is certainly Warren
Beatty’s love letter to himself (he is portrayed as the only competent cop on
the force; Tess leaves him because he is too busy single-handedly saving the
city from the mob; all of the marketing featured his face prominently; I could
go on and on), the writers managed to slip one by him and make the movie a
secretly feminist one. The story isn’t
Dick Tracy vs. the mob, or gangland violence, but instead the tragedy of a
woman trying to escape patriarchy and misogyny and being destroyed by that same
patriarchy because she was too independent to let live.
No comments:
Post a Comment